- PLoS One. 2022; 17(6): e0270103. »
- Decision Letter 0
2022; 17 (6) : e0270103. Typed online 2022 Jun 30. doi: /diary.pone.0270103.r001 Johnson Chun-Sing Cheung, Section Publisher Copyright © 2022 Johnson Chun-Sing Cheung
This will be an unbarred supply post distributed under the terms of the new Innovative Commons Attribution Permit, and that permits open-ended play with, delivery, and breeding in any medium, provided the initial creator and you will resource was credited.
If you need and also make changes to the economic revelation, please include your current statement on the cover letter
Immediately after consideration, we feel that it features merit however, will not fully meet PLOS Your guide criteria whilst currently really stands. Therefore, i invite you to definitely fill in a modified sort of the brand new manuscript one address contact information the latest items raised when you look at the remark processes.
Delight submit the modified manuscript by the . For a moment you want longer than simply this doing their changes, delight react to which content or get in touch with this new journal place of work during the Before you go to submit your own revise, get on and select the newest ‘Submissions In need of Revision’ folder so you can to acquire the manuscript file.
A great rebuttal letter that responds every single section increased of the instructional publisher and you may customer(s). You need to upload this letter because the a new document labeled ‘Response to help you Reviewers’.
A marked-right up copy of your own manuscript you to shows changes designed to this new fresh version. You really need to publish that it since an alternate document labeled ‘Revised Manuscript with Tune Changes’.
An unmarked particular their changed papers rather than tracked changes. You really need to upload this once the an alternate document labeled ‘Manuscript’.
When the appropriate, it is recommended that your deposit their research protocols into promote this new reproducibility of the efficiency. assigns your own process its identifier (DOI) therefore it will likely be quoted separately afterwards. Getting recommendations find: Simultaneously, PLOS One to also offers a choice for posting fellow-analyzed Lab Method articles, and that define standards hosted on the . Read more information about discussing protocols during the
step 1. Please make sure your manuscript match PLOS Your layout standards, and additionally those individuals for file naming. The fresh new PLOS One build themes is present within
“So it endeavor was backed by a sufferers off Offense Work (VOCA) federal citation-thanks to offer issued to the office of one’s Tx Governor (OOG) Child Sex Trafficking Cluster and you may Traffick911. New mentor from the protocol – Traffick911 – has helped toward analysis construction and you may study collection bundle described inside process. Traffick911 directors enjoys accepted this new method revealed here. The brand new feedback, results, conclusions, and you will recommendations shown contained in this guide are those of your writer(s) and don’t fundamentally echo the opinions of your own VOCA, OOG, or Traffick911.
Excite county just what character the fresh new funders got from the research. If the funders had no character, please condition: “”The new funders didn’t come with character within the analysis construction, investigation range and you may studies, choice to post, otherwise planning of your own manuscript.””
Please become which revised Part out-of Funder statement on your shelter letter; we’ll change the on the web submission form in your stead.
3. Your own stability declaration is to just come in the ways part of their manuscript. When your integrity statement is written in almost any area together with the Procedures, please erase it away from almost every other area.
Customer #1: That it method describes an important testing out of a keen anti-sex trafficking system, in addition to ensuing analyses will almost certainly feel a meaningful inclusion into the community
p2: The fresh new figure for 300,000 within-exposure teens should be made clear, because the bounds which childhood are considered at stake during the which pass won’t be the same once the those individuals used later for the the methods to choose which people are “on the line” and you will eligible for the application form. The language will likely be revised in these introductory paragraphs plus the methods to make it clear toward audience that the discrepancy can be found.
