- PLoS That. 2021; 16(2): e0246350. »
- Author response to Decision Letter 0
To begin with, we need to thank the fresh publisher additionally the reviewers getting your time and effort committed to looking at that it manuscript. The comments was basically very beneficial to evolve our very own works.
From your views, we are really not so long as relationship app use make a difference to mating orientation
Playing with a massive attempt out of single Spanish college students (n = 902) that it papers looks at just how personal differences in mating direction changes between those people using dating apps and you may non-users. My personal understanding of the introduction is that they must view the partnership ranging from mating small-identity and much time-title orientations together with use of relationships applications. As opposed to considering products which can impact the the means to access relationship programs just like the learnt on the past literature, it predict choice for long-identity and you can brief-title mating direction regarding usage of relationship applications. Particularly, they regress ages gender, sexual direction, and also the entry to relationships programs into SOI-Roentgen, SOI-Behavior, SOI-Attitudes, and you can SOI-Attract, and you will A lot of time-title Mating Direction (LTMO). Elizabeth.g., throughout the abstract people say that there was basically no differences in the fresh enough time-identity direction while the a function of play with/non-have fun with. I’ve found this problematic regarding a theoretic section, because they frequently believe that matchmaking software fool around with could affect mating positioning instead of the other way to. Mating positioning since counted which have SOI-R and you can MSOI are tips out of choices and you can identification attributes.
Response: We want to give thanks to Reviewer 1 towards the some time and energy invested in examining the manuscript and their/their own comments. Their recommendations have been quite beneficial to change the functions.
From the analysis nearly step 1/step three of one’s students had been categorized as being sexual fraction
Thanks for the opportunity to describe this time. Our very own search mission is to try to be certain that if you can find differences between pages and low-profiles out of relationships programs when you look at the mating orientations (short-title and you can much time-term). You will find tried to get this to sharper from the altering the latest title of our own manuscript, that’s today “Perform young matchmaking app pages and you will non-profiles differ into the mating orientations?”. Within study, no particular causality (character apps use or applications have fun with character) is intended. That have a cross-sectional construction, we simply cannot establish people. I’ve used the studies that we think that’s ideal ideal for response to our very own browse question. Throughout the Conceptual (p. dos, outlines 30-33), as an instance, i authored:
It absolutely was discovered that, while relationships apps pages got a high brief-title mating positioning than simply low-users (more regular conclusion, high appeal, and much more positive attitude), there had been no variations in the brand new long-term direction Pasadena, CA sexy women while the a purpose of explore/non-use.
Here, together with all throughout the brand new manuscript, i have demonstrated the results once the descriptive, perhaps not with one specific expectation of reasons and you will outcomes.
The method area offers a impact of the attempt attributes. The fresh try regarding pupils apparently diverge somewhat off a standard scholar society regarding the newest proportion out of low-heterosexual people. This is not talked about in the investigation constraints (insufficient representativeness).
Response: Thank-you very much to suit your statements and you can tip. All of our take to can be so unlike regarding knowledge accomplished in other geographic and social contexts, which have a higher ratio of members of sexual minorities. But not, we’re being unsure of regarding as to the reasons this should be indicative from lack out of representativeness, even when, for sure, we together with don’t verify representativeness of our own test. The fresh new sampling because of it investigation is actually equivalent otherwise much like the fresh sampling regarding earlier in the day training throughout the same look group (find Desk below).
